Qualitative Researd

Peaceful End of Life surmise This paper is written to examine Corneila Ruland and Shirley Moores Peaceful End of Life hypothesis and its examination on promoting positive outcomes for unhurrieds and their families during the dec relief process. Also, examine how the possible action is understood in the Christian view as strong as viewing honorable principles. As a Critical Care apply I foreboding for the end tolerant mostly on a nonchalant basis. During this process, I non only sine qua non to pity for the dying but, I essential to learn how I can ease the suffering and heart break of the family.During my athletic field of possibility and Ethics, I discovered Cornelia M. Ruland and Shirley M. Moores Peaceful End of Life Theory. This scheme shows how possibility addresses the holistic sympathize with civilize to support a pacificationful finish up of vitality. I found this possible action to be useful by macrocosm foreswear of the suffering of distress, prov iding sympathiser, deference as a human world, having peace and by being with those who supervise. (Martha Raile Alligood, PhD, RN, ANEF, Ann Marriner Tomey, PhD, RN, FAAN, 2010). Ruland and Moore theorize that with easing fears of demolition, it can be a peaceful curio of look event.Not just by providing daily demand and task but, also by pity for the dying (2010, p. 754). Many factors contribute to dismiss of career situations for each forbearings, families, and health care providers. During the Peaceful End of Life Theory the standard of care is based on research in areas of pain in the ass management, sootheableness for the tolerant of of, nutritional needfully for the diligent, and relaxation needs (2010, p. 755). These factors are influenced by age, history of unwellness, phantasmal values, and heath care concerns. Most of our efforts as humans are to improve our fibre of sustenance.Understanding the importance of having a peaceful inflection into ano ther stage of career is beneficial. demolition is always inevitable and always a factor in the lives of family members facing much(prenominal) a stressful quantify. We should strive to care minimize pain and suffering at the end of our purports tour with peace and comfort. Providing comfort is the most authoritative part of quality care with an mature illness. Within the peaceful EOL theory there are lead opinions that are examined and reviewed by patients that are in the dying process. EOL care focuses primarily on comfort when a cure is no longer possible.Also, being free of pain is mostly the cardinal part of many patients going by means of the EOL live on. A treatment plan should take place when a patient is experiencing pain. bonny pain free is one of the major concerns of people dying (Dunn, 2001). To moderate peace with yourself and your love one, you must distinguish your pain from their pain. Showing compliments and having dignity helps the patient feel th at they are still loved and cherished as individuals. Having peace with the stopping points they have make and the outcome helps the patient handing over over into the EOL concept.I feel that if a patient is not at peace with death and dying thence it makes it extremely disenfranchised for the family. If a patient is having no worries or fears to leave this earth, then they are physically piss, psychologically ready and spiritually ready to face the end of their sprightliness. The last concept to talk about is being soaked to their families in a trying metre (2010, p. 756). Feeling at peace and having tightness to others helps the patient variation peacefully which could be the scariest part of dying. During any point of illness patients and families need to be prepared emotionally and spiritually for death (Dunn, 2001).Ruland and Moore identified six theoretical assertions for the peaceful end of liveliness theory that include monitoring and administering pain meds, gettin g family involved in decision making regarding decisions that need to be made for the patient, relieving physical discomfort by supporting rest periods, relaxation, provide support to the patient and family members, encourage family participation with patient care and last, monitoring the patients comfort, dignity and respect (2010, p. 757). retrospect Clarity In the peaceful end of conduct theory all of its theory has been covered and has clearly been understood.The assumption of the theory, that providing comfort for the patient allows a better transition into the stages of the end of life to supporting the family finished difficult times shows how the concept varies in divers(prenominal) degrees, but are all consequential to the theory (2010, p. 758). Simplicity The EOL theory has been described as one of the higher(prenominal) levels of middle range theories. It focuses on what is important to the patient at the end of life and how the patient views life. It also has severa l different aims and aspects on how one values the comfort and dignity finishedout the rest of their life (2010, p. 59). Generality The peaceful end of life theory concept came from a Norse context that based a study on the dying. The theory is based on not being in pain, the experience of comfort, having dignity and respect, being at peace, and allowing the patient to be close to significant others. This theory allows the standards to guide a person through the peaceful end of life and allows the family to respond and adapt (2010, p. 759). Empirical Precision to each one part of the peaceful end of life concept is based on the inducive and reasonable part of guiding the practice.With the EOL theory its five concepts measured were mixed. Its observations were based on the patient and family perceptions of their care with the decisions made during the dying process (2010, p. 760). In the empirical precision the EOL theory illustrates that the five concepts were beneficial to the patient and the family. As nurses dealing with end of life issues, we strive to take care of the individualised values of the patient but, also the medical, legal, and ethical aspects of the decision process get in the way. Sorting through these issues helps to gain respect with the family.Conflicts may arise with EOL decisions, but establishing cogitation with the patient and families helps focus on the elementary values of care (G. Leigh Wilkerson, 1995). Often times ethical issues play a big role in EOL care. For example, withdrawing care from a mechanical intubated patient is a big ethical issue. Are we prolonging life or are we delaying death. A dole out of times holding people on through mechanical ventilation is not ethical. Sometimes patients get dependent on mechanical ventilation which delays death then the family has to make decisions to withdraw care.We should respect our patients autonomy and allow them the independence to make decisions for themselves. We should pr actice beneficence, fidelity, and non-malfeasance as health care providers. Holding on makes it harder on the patient and prolonging the inevitable (Simon, 2008). As a Christian, letting my patient die with respect and dignity would be a achievement in our Saviors eyes. Life is a gift. at that place is a time in everybodys life that our body is not emergence and healing, but failing. This is when we enter into another degree of our life. Having a peaceful end of life is choosing quality for the rest of your life.Reference Dunn, H. (2001). Hard Choices For pleasing People 4th ed. Lansdowne, VA A & A Publishers, Inc. G. Leigh Wilkerson, R. (1995). A Different Season The Hospice Journey. Fayetteville, AR Limbertwig Press. Martha Raile Alligood, PhD, RN, ANEF, Ann Marriner Tomey, PhD, RN, FAAN. (2010). Nursing Theorists and Their Works 7th ed. Marylan Heights, bit Mosby Elsevier. Simon, C. (2008). Ethical issues in palliative care. Retrieved from Oxford Journals http//rcgp-innov ait. oxfordjournals. org/ field/1/4/274. full http//rcgp-innovait. oxfordjournals. org/ cognitive content/1/4/274. full